Beyond Borders

"Nature (and that includes us) is not made of parts within wholes. It is made up of wholes within wholes. All boundaries, national boundaries included, are fundamentally arbitrary. We invent them and then, ironically, we find ourselves trapped within them."

These are the profound words of Peter Senge, founder and director of the Society for Organisational Learning and a senior lecturer at MIT. Here's another pearl of wisdom:

"When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world."

That came from John Muir, the naturalist. The point I wish to extract from these two quotes is that we live in a world of interconnections and interdependencies. It's nice to think we can break down problems into small chunks and deal with them individually but it doesn't always work. And yet it feels natural to think in 'straight lines' of cause - effect - cause - effect - ........ It's called linear thinking. Whereas in reality things tend to happen in circles rather than linearly. In short we live in a non-linear world where the results of well-intended actions, although seemingly successful at the time, can come back to bite us!

To make things more difficult for ourselves, we add constraints in the form of man-made boundaries. These occur in every aspect of life, the obvious one being territorial. But religion, race, politics, personal mindsets, organisations........ are all subject to artificial boundaries. There are always conflicts on this planet and at the time of writing these include, Israel/Palestine, Egypt, Syria, the economies of the Euro zone, UK and US, rising levels of poverty, ........ to name but a few. On each of these issues, so called 'experts' appear on the media and announce quick-fix solutions. Let's take as an example the UK economy and I will try not to portray myself as a quick-fix expert! The Chancellor's (not very) quick- fix solution to the country's malaise is 'austerity'. Drive down the debt by increased taxation and reduced public expenditure and if that doesn't work blame factors beyond your control! But the factors beyond the Chancellor's control are a fundamental and integral part or the UK's fiscal problem. So by trying to separate the UK as a 'chunk' and dealing with its income and expenditure in isolation, is tackling the symptom of the problem rather than the fundamental problem.

There are those who would go further with the 'chunk theory' and separate the UK from the rest of the world, starting by severing the link with Europe. As well as those who would separate Scotland from the UK. But why stop there? Most of the UK's wealth is generated in the south east of England so perhaps the citizens of the home counties should be pushing for independence!

I would suggest the logic for such reductionist thinking is flawed. We need to think beyond the boundaries we have created and succeeded in trapping ourselves. Despite numerous man-made boundaries, we are ONE species, homo sapien. Our ingenuity, compared with other species on the planet, has been unrivalled. Bur our naivety, in terms of survivability, is scary. To believe in perpetual growth on a finite planet, one must be mad or an economist! That is what we are doing and continue to do. What's more, through the creation of artificial divisions within our species, some parts of the planet have benefited from growth, whilst other parts haven't. The developing (another word for 'poor') part of the world now, unsurprisingly, wants to catch up. But this can only happen if the developed (another word for 'rich') part of the world gives something up because the world's resources are limited and some commodities, like fossil fuels, are fast running out. In my humble opinion, that is the fundamental problem facing the planet and other 'parochial' problems are symptoms of this underlying malaise.

So we need to think beyond borders, which means remembering we are but one species as part of many, co-existing on one planet. We need to think about DEVELOPMENT, which means getting better, rather than GROWTH, which means getting bigger, because the latter is unsustainable. If we agree with the previous two sentences then traditional boundaries - territorial, religious, racial, and so on - become less relevant and therefore more manageable.

This blog isn't going to change the world but I am convinced radical change will happen although regrettably it will probably take a few more disasters - climatic, political, economic, social - before common sense will prevail. Sad isn't it?!